0.13/0.13 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.13/0.15 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WoIrWg8qjA true 0.16/0.37 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu 0.16/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.16/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.16/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.16/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.16/0.37 % CPULimit : 1200 0.16/0.37 % WCLimit : 120 0.16/0.37 % DateTime : Tue Jul 13 14:48:06 EDT 2021 0.16/0.37 % CPUTime : 0.16/0.37 % Running portfolio for 120 s 0.16/0.37 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.16/0.37 % Number of cores: 8 0.16/0.37 % Python version: Python 3.6.8 0.16/0.37 % Running in HO mode 0.53/0.69 % Total configuration time : 828 0.53/0.69 % Estimated wc time : 983 0.53/0.69 % Estimated cpu time (8 cpus) : 122.875 0.58/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif4.sh running for 47s 0.58/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c.s.sh running for 47s 0.58/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c_ic.sh running for 47s 0.58/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/15_e_short1.sh running for 18s 0.58/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_noforms.sh running for 53s 0.58/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/20_acsne_simpl.sh running for 24s 0.58/0.79 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_b.comb.sh running for 41s 0.58/0.79 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/30_sp5.sh running for 35s 0.59/0.82 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/30_b.l.sh running for 53s 5.42/1.32 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif.sh running for 33s 19.69/3.18 % Solved by lams/15_e_short1.sh. 19.69/3.18 % running E: timeout 11 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/eprover-ho --pos-ext=all --neg-ext=all /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WoIrWg8qjA/e_inputdda2b4 --cpu-limit=9 --auto-schedule -s -p 19.69/3.18 % done 163 iterations in 2.360s 19.69/3.18 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p' 19.69/3.18 % SZS output start Refutation 19.69/3.18 thf(reg_type, type, reg: $tType). 19.69/3.18 thf(spain_type, type, spain: reg). 19.69/3.18 thf(tpp_type, type, tpp: reg > reg > $o). 19.69/3.18 thf(paris_type, type, paris: reg). 19.69/3.18 thf(ec_type, type, ec: reg > reg > $o). 19.69/3.18 thf(a_type, type, a: $i > $i > $o). 19.69/3.18 thf(p_type, type, p: reg > reg > $o). 19.69/3.18 thf(catalunya_type, type, catalunya: reg). 19.69/3.18 thf(mvalid_type, type, mvalid: ($i > $o) > $o). 19.69/3.18 thf(o_type, type, o: reg > reg > $o). 19.69/3.18 thf(mbox_type, type, mbox: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 19.69/3.18 thf(c_type, type, c: reg > reg > $o). 19.69/3.18 thf(france_type, type, france: reg). 19.69/3.18 thf(pp_type, type, pp: reg > reg > $o). 19.69/3.18 thf(ntpp_type, type, ntpp: reg > reg > $o). 19.69/3.18 thf(ntpp, axiom,(( ntpp ) = 19.69/3.18 (^[X:reg,Y:reg]: 19.69/3.18 ( ( pp @ X @ Y ) & ( ~( ?[Z:reg]: ( ( ec @ Z @ Y ) & ( ec @ Z @ X ) ) ) ) )))). 19.69/3.18 thf(ec, axiom,(( ec ) = 19.69/3.18 (^[X:reg,Y:reg]: ( ( c @ X @ Y ) & ( ~( o @ X @ Y ) ) )))). 19.69/3.18 thf(o, axiom,(( o ) = 19.69/3.18 (^[X:reg,Y:reg]: ( ?[Z:reg]: ( ( p @ Z @ Y ) & ( p @ Z @ X ) ) )))). 19.69/3.18 thf(p, axiom,(( p ) = 19.69/3.18 (^[X:reg,Y:reg]: ( ![Z:reg]: ( ( c @ Z @ X ) => ( c @ Z @ Y ) ) )))). 19.69/3.18 thf('0', plain, 19.69/3.18 (( p ) = 19.69/3.18 ( ^[X:reg,Y:reg]: ( ![Z:reg]: ( ( c @ Z @ X ) => ( c @ Z @ Y ) ) ) )), 19.69/3.18 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [p])). 19.69/3.18 thf('1', plain, 19.69/3.18 (( p ) = 19.69/3.18 ( ^[V_1:reg,V_2:reg]: 19.69/3.18 ( ![X4:reg]: ( ( c @ X4 @ V_1 ) => ( c @ X4 @ V_2 ) ) ) )), 19.69/3.18 define([status(thm)])). 19.69/3.18 thf('2', plain, 19.69/3.18 (( o ) = 19.69/3.18 ( ^[X:reg,Y:reg]: ( ?[Z:reg]: ( ( p @ Z @ Y ) & ( p @ Z @ X ) ) ) )), 19.69/3.18 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [o, '1'])). 19.69/3.18 thf('3', plain, 19.69/3.18 (( o ) = 19.69/3.18 ( ^[V_1:reg,V_2:reg]: 19.69/3.18 ( ?[X4:reg]: ( ( p @ X4 @ V_2 ) & ( p @ X4 @ V_1 ) ) ) )), 19.69/3.18 define([status(thm)])). 19.69/3.18 thf('4', plain, 19.69/3.18 (( ec ) = ( ^[X:reg,Y:reg]: ( ( c @ X @ Y ) & ( ~( o @ X @ Y ) ) ) )), 19.69/3.18 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [ec, '3', '1'])). 19.69/3.18 thf('5', plain, 19.69/3.18 (( ec ) = 19.69/3.18 ( ^[V_1:reg,V_2:reg]: ( ( c @ V_1 @ V_2 ) & ( ~( o @ V_1 @ V_2 ) ) ) )), 19.69/3.18 define([status(thm)])). 19.69/3.18 thf('6', plain, 19.69/3.18 (( ntpp ) = 19.69/3.18 ( ^[X:reg,Y:reg]: 19.69/3.18 ( ( pp @ X @ Y ) & 19.69/3.18 ( ~( ?[Z:reg]: ( ( ec @ Z @ Y ) & ( ec @ Z @ X ) ) ) ) ) )), 19.69/3.18 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [ntpp, '5', '3', '1'])). 19.69/3.18 thf('7', plain, 19.69/3.18 (( ntpp ) = 19.69/3.18 ( ^[V_1:reg,V_2:reg]: 19.69/3.18 ( ( pp @ V_1 @ V_2 ) & 19.69/3.18 ( ~( ?[X4:reg]: ( ( ec @ X4 @ V_2 ) & ( ec @ X4 @ V_1 ) ) ) ) ) )), 19.69/3.18 define([status(thm)])). 19.69/3.18 thf(pp, axiom,(( pp ) = 19.69/3.18 (^[X:reg,Y:reg]: ( ( p @ X @ Y ) & ( ~( p @ Y @ X ) ) )))). 19.69/3.18 thf('8', plain, 19.69/3.18 (( pp ) = ( ^[X:reg,Y:reg]: ( ( p @ X @ Y ) & ( ~( p @ Y @ X ) ) ) )), 19.69/3.18 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [pp, '1'])). 19.69/3.18 thf('9', plain, 19.69/3.18 (( pp ) = 19.69/3.18 ( ^[V_1:reg,V_2:reg]: ( ( p @ V_1 @ V_2 ) & ( ~( p @ V_2 @ V_1 ) ) ) )), 19.69/3.18 define([status(thm)])). 19.69/3.18 thf(mvalid, axiom,(( mvalid ) = 19.69/3.18 (^[Phi:( $i > $o )]: ( ![W:$i]: ( Phi @ W ) )))). 19.69/3.18 thf('10', plain, 19.69/3.18 (( mvalid ) = ( ^[Phi:( $i > $o )]: ( ![W:$i]: ( Phi @ W ) ) )), 19.69/3.18 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [mvalid])). 19.69/3.18 thf('11', plain, 19.69/3.18 (( mvalid ) = ( ^[V_1:( $i > $o )]: ( ![X4:$i]: ( V_1 @ X4 ) ) )), 19.69/3.18 define([status(thm)])). 19.69/3.18 thf(mbox, axiom,(( mbox ) = 19.69/3.18 (^[R:( $i > $i > $o ),Phi:( $i > $o ),W:$i]: 19.69/3.18 ( ![V:$i]: ( ( Phi @ V ) | ( ~( R @ W @ V ) ) ) )))). 19.69/3.18 thf('12', plain, 19.69/3.18 (( mbox ) = 19.69/3.18 ( ^[R:( $i > $i > $o ),Phi:( $i > $o ),W:$i]: 19.69/3.18 ( ![V:$i]: ( ( Phi @ V ) | ( ~( R @ W @ V ) ) ) ) )), 19.69/3.18 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [mbox])). 19.69/3.18 thf('13', plain, 19.69/3.18 (( mbox ) = 19.69/3.18 ( ^[V_1:( $i > $i > $o ),V_2:( $i > $o ),V_3:$i]: 19.69/3.18 ( ![X4:$i]: ( ( V_2 @ X4 ) | ( ~( V_1 @ V_3 @ X4 ) ) ) ) )), 19.69/3.18 define([status(thm)])). 19.69/3.18 thf(ax3, axiom, 19.69/3.18 (mvalid @ ( mbox @ a @ ( ^[X:$i]: ( ntpp @ paris @ france ) ) ))). 19.69/3.18 thf(zf_stmt_0, axiom, 19.69/3.18 (![X4:$i,X6:$i]: 19.69/3.18 ( ( ~( a @ X4 @ X6 ) ) | 19.69/3.18 ( ( ~( ?[X12:reg]: 19.69/3.18 ( ( ~( ?[X20:reg]: 19.69/3.18 ( ( ![X24:reg]: ( ( c @ X24 @ X20 ) => ( c @ X24 @ X12 ) ) ) & 19.69/3.18 ( ![X22:reg]: 19.69/3.18 ( ( c @ X22 @ X20 ) => ( c @ X22 @ paris ) ) ) ) ) ) & 19.69/3.18 ( c @ X12 @ paris ) & 19.69/3.18 ( ~( ?[X14:reg]: 19.69/3.18 ( ( ![X18:reg]: ( ( c @ X18 @ X14 ) => ( c @ X18 @ X12 ) ) ) & 19.69/3.18 ( ![X16:reg]: 19.69/3.18 ( ( c @ X16 @ X14 ) => ( c @ X16 @ france ) ) ) ) ) ) & 19.69/3.18 ( c @ X12 @ france ) ) ) ) & 19.69/3.18 ( ~( ![X10:reg]: ( ( c @ X10 @ france ) => ( c @ X10 @ paris ) ) ) ) & 19.69/3.18 ( ![X8:reg]: ( ( c @ X8 @ paris ) => ( c @ X8 @ france ) ) ) ) ))). 19.69/3.18 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain, 19.69/3.18 ( (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : $i]: 19.69/3.18 (((!!) @ (^[Y1 : $i]: 19.69/3.18 (((((~) @ (a @ Y0 @ Y1))) | 19.69/3.18 (((((~) @ (((??) @ (^[Y2 : reg]: 19.69/3.18 (((((~) @ (((??) @ ( 19.69/3.18 ^[Y3 : reg]: 19.69/3.18 ( 19.69/3.18 ( 19.69/3.18 (( 19.69/3.18 (!!) @ ( 19.69/3.18 ^[Y4 : reg]: 19.69/3.18 (( 19.69/3.18 (c @ 19.69/3.18 Y4 @ 19.69/3.18 Y3) => 19.69/3.18 (c @ 19.69/3.18 Y4 @ Y2)))))) & 19.69/3.18 (( 19.69/3.18 (!!) @ ( 19.69/3.18 ^[Y4 : reg]: 19.69/3.18 (( 19.69/3.18 (c @ 19.69/3.18 Y4 @ 19.69/3.18 Y3) => 19.69/3.18 (c @ 19.69/3.18 Y4 @ 19.69/3.18 paris))))))))))))) & 19.69/3.18 (c @ Y2 @ paris) & 19.69/3.18 (((~) @ (((??) @ ( 19.69/3.18 ^[Y3 : reg]: 19.69/3.18 ( 19.69/3.18 ( 19.69/3.18 (( 19.69/3.18 (!!) @ ( 19.69/3.18 ^[Y4 : reg]: 19.69/3.18 (( 19.69/3.18 (c @ 19.69/3.18 Y4 @ 19.69/3.18 Y3) => 19.69/3.18 (c @ 19.69/3.18 Y4 @ Y2)))))) & 19.69/3.18 (( 19.69/3.18 (!!) @ ( 19.69/3.18 ^[Y4 : reg]: 19.69/3.18 (( 19.69/3.18 (c @ 19.69/3.18 Y4 @ 19.69/3.18 Y3) => 19.69/3.18 (c @ 19.69/3.18 Y4 @ 19.69/3.18 france))))))))))))) & 19.69/3.18 (c @ Y2 @ france)))))))) & 19.69/3.18 (((~) @ (((!!) @ (^[Y2 : reg]: 19.69/3.18 (((c @ Y2 @ france) => 19.69/3.18 (c @ Y2 @ paris)))))))) & 19.69/3.18 (((!!) @ (^[Y2 : reg]: 19.69/3.18 (((c @ Y2 @ paris) => (c @ 19.69/3.18 Y2 @ france))))))))))))))))), 19.69/3.18 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])). 19.69/3.18 thf(tpp, axiom,(( tpp ) = 19.69/3.18 (^[X:reg,Y:reg]: 19.69/3.18 ( ( pp @ X @ Y ) & ( ?[Z:reg]: ( ( ec @ Z @ Y ) & ( ec @ Z @ X ) ) ) )))). 19.69/3.18 thf('14', plain, 19.69/3.18 (( tpp ) = 19.69/3.18 ( ^[X:reg,Y:reg]: 19.69/3.18 ( ( pp @ X @ Y ) & ( ?[Z:reg]: ( ( ec @ Z @ Y ) & ( ec @ Z @ X ) ) ) ) )), 19.69/3.18 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [tpp, '5', '3', '1'])). 19.69/3.18 thf('15', plain, 19.69/3.18 (( tpp ) = 19.69/3.18 ( ^[V_1:reg,V_2:reg]: 19.69/3.18 ( ( pp @ V_1 @ V_2 ) & 19.69/3.18 ( ?[X4:reg]: ( ( ec @ X4 @ V_2 ) & ( ec @ X4 @ V_1 ) ) ) ) )), 19.69/3.18 define([status(thm)])). 19.69/3.18 thf(ax1, axiom, 19.69/3.18 (mvalid @ ( mbox @ a @ ( ^[X:$i]: ( tpp @ catalunya @ spain ) ) ))). 19.69/3.18 thf(zf_stmt_1, axiom, 19.69/3.18 (![X4:$i,X6:$i]: 19.69/3.18 ( ( ~( a @ X4 @ X6 ) ) | 19.69/3.18 ( ( ?[X12:reg]: 19.69/3.18 ( ( ~( ?[X20:reg]: 19.69/3.18 ( ( ![X24:reg]: ( ( c @ X24 @ X20 ) => ( c @ X24 @ X12 ) ) ) & 19.69/3.18 ( ![X22:reg]: 19.69/3.18 ( ( c @ X22 @ X20 ) => ( c @ X22 @ catalunya ) ) ) ) ) ) & 19.69/3.18 ( c @ X12 @ catalunya ) & 19.69/3.18 ( ~( ?[X14:reg]: 19.69/3.18 ( ( ![X18:reg]: ( ( c @ X18 @ X14 ) => ( c @ X18 @ X12 ) ) ) & 19.69/3.18 ( ![X16:reg]: ( ( c @ X16 @ X14 ) => ( c @ X16 @ spain ) ) ) ) ) ) & 19.69/3.18 ( c @ X12 @ spain ) ) ) & 19.69/3.18 ( ~( ![X10:reg]: ( ( c @ X10 @ spain ) => ( c @ X10 @ catalunya ) ) ) ) & 19.69/3.18 ( ![X8:reg]: ( ( c @ X8 @ catalunya ) => ( c @ X8 @ spain ) ) ) ) ))). 19.69/3.18 thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain, 19.69/3.18 ( (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : $i]: 19.69/3.18 (((!!) @ (^[Y1 : $i]: 19.69/3.18 (((((~) @ (a @ Y0 @ Y1))) | 19.69/3.18 (((((??) @ (^[Y2 : reg]: 19.69/3.18 (((((~) @ (((??) @ (^[Y3 : reg]: 19.69/3.18 ( 19.69/3.18 ( 19.69/3.18 (( 19.69/3.18 (!!) @ ( 19.69/3.18 ^[Y4 : reg]: 19.69/3.18 (( 19.69/3.18 (c @ 19.69/3.18 Y4 @ 19.69/3.18 Y3) => 19.69/3.18 (c @ 19.69/3.18 Y4 @ Y2)))))) & 19.69/3.18 (( 19.69/3.18 (!!) @ ( 19.69/3.18 ^[Y4 : reg]: 19.69/3.18 (( 19.69/3.18 (c @ 19.69/3.18 Y4 @ 19.69/3.18 Y3) => 19.69/3.18 (c @ 19.69/3.18 Y4 @ 19.69/3.18 catalunya))))))))))))) & 19.69/3.18 (c @ Y2 @ catalunya) & 19.69/3.18 (((~) @ (((??) @ (^[Y3 : reg]: 19.69/3.18 ( 19.69/3.18 ( 19.69/3.18 (( 19.69/3.18 (!!) @ ( 19.69/3.18 ^[Y4 : reg]: 19.69/3.18 (( 19.69/3.18 (c @ 19.69/3.18 Y4 @ 19.69/3.18 Y3) => 19.69/3.18 (c @ 19.69/3.18 Y4 @ Y2)))))) & 19.69/3.18 (( 19.69/3.18 (!!) @ ( 19.69/3.18 ^[Y4 : reg]: 19.69/3.18 (( 19.69/3.18 (c @ 19.69/3.18 Y4 @ 19.69/3.18 Y3) => 19.69/3.18 (c @ 19.69/3.18 Y4 @ 19.69/3.18 spain))))))))))))) & 19.69/3.18 (c @ Y2 @ spain)))))) & 19.69/3.18 (((~) @ (((!!) @ (^[Y2 : reg]: 19.69/3.18 (((c @ Y2 @ spain) => 19.69/3.18 (c @ Y2 @ catalunya)))))))) & 19.69/3.18 (((!!) @ (^[Y2 : reg]: 19.69/3.18 (((c @ Y2 @ catalunya) => (c @ 19.69/3.18 Y2 @ spain))))))))))))))))), 19.69/3.18 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])). 19.69/3.18 thf(c_symmetric, axiom, (![X:reg,Y:reg]: ( ( c @ X @ Y ) => ( c @ Y @ X ) ))). 19.69/3.18 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain, 19.69/3.18 ( (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : reg]: 19.69/3.18 (((!!) @ (^[Y1 : reg]: (((c @ Y0 @ Y1) => (c @ Y1 @ Y0)))))))))), 19.69/3.18 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [c_symmetric])). 19.69/3.18 thf(con, conjecture, 19.69/3.18 (mvalid @ 19.69/3.18 ( mbox @ 19.69/3.18 a @ 19.69/3.18 ( ^[X:$i]: 19.69/3.18 ( ![Z:reg]: 19.69/3.18 ( ( ( o @ Z @ paris ) | ( o @ Z @ catalunya ) ) => 19.69/3.18 ( ( o @ Z @ spain ) | ( o @ Z @ france ) ) ) ) ) ))). 19.69/3.18 thf(zf_stmt_2, conjecture, 19.69/3.18 (![X4:$i,X6:$i]: 19.69/3.18 ( ( ~( a @ X4 @ X6 ) ) | 19.69/3.18 ( ![X8:reg]: 19.69/3.18 ( ( ( ?[X16:reg]: 19.69/3.18 ( ( ![X20:reg]: ( ( c @ X20 @ X16 ) => ( c @ X20 @ X8 ) ) ) & 19.69/3.18 ( ![X18:reg]: ( ( c @ X18 @ X16 ) => ( c @ X18 @ catalunya ) ) ) ) ) | 19.69/3.18 ( ?[X10:reg]: 19.69/3.18 ( ( ![X14:reg]: ( ( c @ X14 @ X10 ) => ( c @ X14 @ X8 ) ) ) & 19.69/3.18 ( ![X12:reg]: ( ( c @ X12 @ X10 ) => ( c @ X12 @ paris ) ) ) ) ) ) => 19.69/3.18 ( ( ?[X28:reg]: 19.69/3.18 ( ( ![X32:reg]: ( ( c @ X32 @ X28 ) => ( c @ X32 @ X8 ) ) ) & 19.69/3.18 ( ![X30:reg]: ( ( c @ X30 @ X28 ) => ( c @ X30 @ france ) ) ) ) ) | 19.69/3.18 ( ?[X22:reg]: 19.69/3.18 ( ( ![X26:reg]: ( ( c @ X26 @ X22 ) => ( c @ X26 @ X8 ) ) ) & 19.69/3.18 ( ![X24:reg]: ( ( c @ X24 @ X22 ) => ( c @ X24 @ spain ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ))). 19.69/3.18 thf(zf_stmt_3, negated_conjecture, 19.69/3.18 (~( ![X4:$i,X6:$i]: 19.69/3.18 ( ( ~( a @ X4 @ X6 ) ) | 19.69/3.18 ( ![X8:reg]: 19.69/3.18 ( ( ( ?[X16:reg]: 19.69/3.18 ( ( ![X20:reg]: ( ( c @ X20 @ X16 ) => ( c @ X20 @ X8 ) ) ) & 19.69/3.18 ( ![X18:reg]: 19.69/3.18 ( ( c @ X18 @ X16 ) => ( c @ X18 @ catalunya ) ) ) ) ) | 19.69/3.18 ( ?[X10:reg]: 19.69/3.18 ( ( ![X14:reg]: ( ( c @ X14 @ X10 ) => ( c @ X14 @ X8 ) ) ) & 19.69/3.18 ( ![X12:reg]: ( ( c @ X12 @ X10 ) => ( c @ X12 @ paris ) ) ) ) ) ) => 19.69/3.18 ( ( ?[X28:reg]: 19.69/3.18 ( ( ![X32:reg]: ( ( c @ X32 @ X28 ) => ( c @ X32 @ X8 ) ) ) & 19.69/3.18 ( ![X30:reg]: ( ( c @ X30 @ X28 ) => ( c @ X30 @ france ) ) ) ) ) | 19.69/3.18 ( ?[X22:reg]: 19.69/3.18 ( ( ![X26:reg]: ( ( c @ X26 @ X22 ) => ( c @ X26 @ X8 ) ) ) & 19.69/3.18 ( ![X24:reg]: ( ( c @ X24 @ X22 ) => ( c @ X24 @ spain ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )), 19.69/3.18 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_2])). 19.69/3.18 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain, 19.69/3.18 (~ (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : $i]: 19.69/3.18 (((!!) @ (^[Y1 : $i]: 19.69/3.18 (((((~) @ (a @ Y0 @ Y1))) | 19.69/3.18 (((!!) @ (^[Y2 : reg]: 19.69/3.18 (((((((??) @ (^[Y3 : reg]: 19.69/3.18 (((((!!) @ ( 19.69/3.18 ^[Y4 : reg]: 19.69/3.18 (( 19.69/3.18 (c @ 19.69/3.18 Y4 @ 19.69/3.18 Y3) => 19.69/3.18 (c @ 19.69/3.18 Y4 @ Y2)))))) & 19.69/3.18 (((!!) @ ( 19.69/3.18 ^[Y4 : reg]: 19.69/3.18 (( 19.69/3.18 (c @ 19.69/3.18 Y4 @ 19.69/3.18 Y3) => 19.69/3.18 (c @ 19.69/3.18 Y4 @ 19.69/3.18 catalunya))))))))))) | 19.69/3.18 (((??) @ (^[Y3 : reg]: 19.69/3.18 (((((!!) @ ( 19.69/3.18 ^[Y4 : reg]: 19.69/3.18 (( 19.69/3.18 (c @ 19.69/3.18 Y4 @ 19.69/3.18 Y3) => 19.69/3.18 (c @ 19.69/3.18 Y4 @ Y2)))))) & 19.69/3.18 (((!!) @ ( 19.69/3.18 ^[Y4 : reg]: 19.69/3.18 (( 19.69/3.18 (c @ 19.69/3.18 Y4 @ 19.69/3.18 Y3) => 19.69/3.18 (c @ 19.69/3.18 Y4 @ 19.69/3.18 paris))))))))))))) => 19.69/3.18 (((((??) @ (^[Y3 : reg]: 19.69/3.18 (((((!!) @ ( 19.69/3.18 ^[Y4 : reg]: 19.69/3.18 (( 19.69/3.18 (c @ 19.69/3.18 Y4 @ 19.69/3.18 Y3) => 19.69/3.18 (c @ 19.69/3.18 Y4 @ Y2)))))) & 19.69/3.18 (((!!) @ ( 19.69/3.18 ^[Y4 : reg]: 19.69/3.18 (( 19.69/3.18 (c @ 19.69/3.18 Y4 @ 19.69/3.18 Y3) => 19.69/3.18 (c @ 19.69/3.18 Y4 @ 19.69/3.18 france))))))))))) | 19.69/3.18 (((??) @ (^[Y3 : reg]: 19.69/3.18 (((((!!) @ ( 19.69/3.18 ^[Y4 : reg]: 19.69/3.18 (( 19.69/3.18 (c @ 19.69/3.18 Y4 @ 19.69/3.18 Y3) => 19.69/3.18 (c @ 19.69/3.18 Y4 @ Y2)))))) & 19.69/3.18 (((!!) @ ( 19.69/3.18 ^[Y4 : reg]: 19.69/3.18 (( 19.69/3.18 (c @ 19.69/3.18 Y4 @ 19.69/3.18 Y3) => 19.69/3.18 (c @ 19.69/3.18 Y4 @ 19.69/3.18 spain))))))))))))))))))))))))))), 19.69/3.18 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_3])). 19.69/3.18 thf(zip_derived_cl2643, plain, ($false), 19.69/3.18 inference('eprover', [status(thm)], 19.69/3.18 [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl8, zip_derived_cl0, 19.69/3.18 zip_derived_cl5])). 19.69/3.18 19.69/3.18 % SZS output end Refutation 19.69/3.18 19.69/3.18 19.69/3.18 % Terminating... 20.24/3.31 % Runner terminated. 20.24/3.31 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting 20.24/3.33 EOF